Politico reports that the Senate Finance Committee’s health care bill is 1502 pages long.  Don’t worry about reading it, no one in Congress will either.  Key to this bill is a 40 percent tax on “high-end” or “cadillac” health care plans.  Why does government think it deserves 40 percent of a compensation package that workers have negotiated with their employers? 

I think it is time for more tea parties to remind Congress how we feel about health care “reform.”

Following my opinion editorial,  school bullies asked me to prove my facts and figures.  I warned them to be prepared to read because I brought hundreds of pages of documents and studies to back up my position.  Below are links to information that I routinely use to make my points about this disasterous tax increase that voters are being bullied into supporting.

Counting Cash: The Facts about Per-Pupil Spending in Colorado

Heritage Foundation: Does Spending More on Education Improve Academic Achievement?

Separation of Degrees: State-By-State Analysis of Teachers’ Compensation for Master’s Degrees

Citizens’ Commission on Civil Rights: National Teachers Union and the Struggle Over School Reform

Remedial education in Colorado higher education:  Page 25 shows Greeley Evans District 6 percentage of first time undergraduates that require remedial education in higher education.

Colorado per-pupil statisics including funding by school district.

Using this intellectual ammunition, we can stand up to school bullies. Vote NO on 3A!  And join Citizens Against School Bullies.

One of the things I find disingenuous about the school bullies’ campaign for 3A is their sudden embrace of charter schools.  In April 2008, Greeley Evans District 6 blamed charter schools for the district’s financial woes.  The Greeley Tribune reported Chief Operations Officer Wayne Eads take on charter schools in the district:

But he [Eads] said much of the crunch was because of the district’s growing charter school student population.

 

Though charter schools, like University Schools and Union Colony Preparatory School, are in District 6, the district’s only role is to pass along the money from state, federal and local levels to the charter schools, keeping about 2.4 percent for administration costs.

 

In the past eight years, while the district’s own student population increased by 9 percent, it saw charter schools grow 79 percent. In the past seven years, the district has seen its charter school allocation increase from $6.8 million to an expected $15.1 million. Each pupil equates to about $6,500 each.

 

“During that time, we have not eliminated a classroom, school or bus route despite loss of revenue,” Eads said.

 

The district makes the argument the growth in charter schools is chipping away at its budget because of fixed operational costs, such as teaching, administration and building costs.

 

The article reveals that students are little more than cash cows for the district.  Less students mean less money.  Charter schools siphon off students so therefore they siphon off cash from the district.  Rather than finding out what it is about charter schools that so many parents find attractive, the district criticizes them for “chipping away at its budget.”

Fast forward to summer 2009 and the start of the push for 3A the massive tax increase.  Now the district is courting, not criticizing, charter schools.  Why?  Because charter school parents are involved, and they vote.  The district wants them to vote yes on 3A so it has included charter schools along with the traditional schools as beneficiaries of mill levy override.

And Wayne Eads is singing a different tune on charter schools.  He recently told a leader in the business community, “I am personally a strong supporter of charters as an expansion of choice for our parents and as competition for the old style model of educational delivery…”

Not surprising that business leader is a actively involved in charter schools in district 6.  Sounds more like campaigning.  Don’t let them BS or bully you.  Vote no on 3A. 

Join our “modest” campaign Citizens Against School Bullies.

The school bullies who are threatening to take away student programs and text books unless  District 6 taxpayers pony up more money are whining.  Apparently some members of the campaign want “equal time” on KFKA because I am helping to organize the opposition to 3A, their massive tax increase.  

What the bullies don’t realize is that the equal time rule pertains only to candidates, not issues. 

My question: why aren’t the series of daily op-eds and a plethora of completely bias “news” articles in the Greeley Tribune enough?  Are they that worried about our new committee Citizens Against School Bullies?  They should be.

Those of us in Greeley Evans School District 6 get daily doses of scare tactics if the massive Mill Levy Override (3A MLO) doesn’t pass.  The real problem is not how much but how the district spends taxpayer dollars.   Check out this great piece in the Wall Street Journal  that explains how teachers’ unions are opposing reforms that lead to greater student achievement among minorities and low income students. 

Throwing more money won’t lead to better educated students; reform will.   We must tie teacher and administrator pay to student achievement and graduation rates.  If we don’t, then parents and students will continue to suffer in the same failing system. Technology, security cameras, new buses, similar starting times may be nice things to have but just having them won’t lead to better educated students.  District 6 must change how it spends taxpayer dollars not just how much it spends. 

Those opposed to 3A please join us at Citizens Against School Bullies.

A few things about growing opposition to Greeley District 6 3A MLO ballot measure.

First, check out Facebook page Citizens Against School Bullies.

Second, it’s been two weeks since I submitted a CORA request for specifics on 27 Greeley Evans District 6 administrators’ total compensation package.  No information yet.  Tomorrow (Monday) I will contact District 6’s attorney for a reason why I can’t get the information I requested. 

And remember Tribune publisher Bart Smith’s naive dig towards those of us who want transparency:

Others who say they want more transparency show their lack of knowledge of how a public institution operates. School financing is an open book. Anyone who chooses can dive into the records and see how every cent is spent.

The district is not quite as cooperative as Smith suggests.

I will say that District 6 did provide teacher compensation information quickly.  But it was to the district’s benefit to do so because the district and the Greeley teachers’ union went to mediation the day after I made the information public — a transparent PR move on the part of District 6.

Finally, an update about teachers’ salaries in District 6.  While testifying in front of the Long Term Fiscal Stability Commission on Thursday, the Colorado Department of Education provided commissioners with various statistics about all school districts in Colorado.

Greeley District 6 ranks 11th in the state in average teacher salary at $49,905 (this does not include benefits such as health insurance and retirement both of which are quite lucrative).  Districts ahead of us include Aspen, Summit County, Cherry Creek, Littleton, Englewood, Boulder Valley, Westminster, Arapahoe 26 J, Adams 12 Five Star and Mapleton.  All of these are either from the Denver/Boulder metro area or wealthy mountain communities with much higher costs of living than Greeley.

I would be happy to pay a great teacher a six figure salary but it must be based on performance and product (student achievement) not longevity nor their own educational advancement.  I’m not the only one who thinks K-12 is past due for compensation reform.  Check out Separation of Degrees from the Center for American Progress run by John Podesta, Chief of Staff for former President Bill Clinton.

We cannot continue funding a dysfunctional system that serves the adults not the consumers, a.k.a. parents and students.